In theme of arbitration, the assessment of the agreement of the parts si translates into an investigation of fact entrusted to referees, censurable in seat of control legitimacy - which is the one entrusted to the judge from Art. 829 of the Italian Civil Code civ. - only in the case in the motivation it is so inadequate by not to allow the reconstruction of the iTER logical followed by referees or per violation of the rules of the art. 1362 SS. Cod. civ .; therefore, the one that challenges the praise not can to limit a recall generically the rules of which ai called articles, but must specify i canons in concrete violated, as well as the point the way in which the referee si is from them discostate, not being sufficient a simple criticism to decision unfavorable formulated through the mere prospect a different and more favorable interpretation.