The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829, co. 1, n. 11 cod. Proc. Civ. Per the praise containing provisions contradictory must be understanding in the sense that is such a co co NTRADDITTIITY MUST MUST EVERY DRAW BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE, i.e. between the motivation ED the device, while the contradiction internal between different pa RTI of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices which involve the nullity of the praise, can assume relevance, which vice of the praise, only in what determines the impossibility absolute of reconstruct the logical and legal process below to the decision per total absence a a motivation attributable to its functional model.