The rule of the specificity of the formulation of the reasons of censorship, prescribed per the appeal in cassation, also worth also for the judgment appeal per null ITY of the Lodo Arbitration ex art. 829 Cod. proc. civ .; this not means that it is absolutely necessary that the appeal contains the indication of the provisions i of law violated, but it is necessary that from the complex of the appeal it results which is it was the regulation (or legal rule) violated by the referees, even if deprived of the A his (exact) denomination, or the principle of right that si assumes violated, the which burden of identification compete a he who is challenged the Lodo arbitral.