Not exists contrast between right and equity, expected that the judgment equity requires although always the reference ad a case legislation and the comparison between d d I Law ED Eventual Criter Equitative chosen, the which one can operate where it is objectively justified a disparity of treatment compared to the that would derive from the from Pplification of the rules of right. is, therefore, power of the referees called to the judgment second equity apply the right every vault in which they they n n navisino the coincidence c On equity, ED the their appreciation at regard si subtrae ad each censorship, since a control on of it would equate ad a union on the rectum exercise of the powers equitations.