The scope of cognition of the judge of the appeal, in the case in it is deduced the vice of contradictory nature of the provisions provided by art. 829 n. 11 cod. Proc. C IV., concerns the contrast between the different parts of the device of the praise, che per the their ironability make impossible the execution of the praise same, as well as, accesses ndo to the interpretation more extensive, the contradictory nature between motivation and device of the praise or between different parts of the motivation, exclusively when la contraddit Torità si resolve in the absoluta impossibility of reconstruct the ratio decidendi, with consequent substantial absence of motivation attributable to its model functional.