The sanction of nullity foreseen by art. 829 n. 11 cod. Proc. Civ. Per the praise containing provisions contradictory must be agreement in the sense that said co NTRADDITTIITY MUST MUST EVERY DRAW THE DIFFERENT DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE, i.e. between the motivation ED the device, while the contradictory between different parts of the motivation, not expressly foreseen between i vices that they involve the nullity of the pit, can assume relevance only in what determines impossib Iritility absolute of reconstruct the logical iter and legal below to decision per total absence a a motivation attributable to its functional model.