Yes has contrarier to the order public, relevant ai senses of art. 829, co. 3, cod. Proc. Civ., When it is the praise, ie the decision in self, that contrasts with the order public; therefore the opposition of the praise not origin, in self, from the violation of the rules mandatory, as much as from the result it it it reaches.
For violation of order public si intends the non -compliance of fundamental rules and cogent, dictates to protection of interests general and therefore not derogable from the will of the parts, nor susceptible of forming object compromise.
Not constitute principles of order public those content in articles 1 and 2 r.d. 21 December 1933, n. 1736 (law checks), nor those cont ENUTI in art. 49 Legislative Decree 21 November 2007, n. 231 (legislation anti -money laundering), nor finally those content in the discipline of the prescription.