The interpretation of the referees, in order per content of one clause contractual, can be to be contested, with the appeal per nullity of the praise, only in ratio at v iolation of rules of right, e not also, therefore, via the mera deduction of erroneity, i.e. the prospect a different interpretation, moreover without the species cunt indication of which hermeneutic criteria the referees they have missed observing. and that the violation of the rules of hermeneutic contractual must be deduced in if de of the appeal of the judgment arbitration by the specification of called rules violated, as well as of the reasons of contrast between esse and le arguments of the referees.