Not is compromising in referees the dispute having ad object the appeal of the resolution of approval of the budget of company for defect of the requirements of truth, clarity precision. Indeed, despite the forecast of terms of decadence from the appeal, with the consequent amnesty of the nullity, the direct A A rules to guarantee these principles not only are imperative, but, being dictated, beyond che a protection of the interest of each member ad being informed of the trend of the management corporate at term of each exercise, also of the custody of all i subjects che with The company enter in ratio, i which are right a to know the situation assets and financial of the body, transcend the interest of the single ED they focus on, therefore, a rights unavailable.
Art. 2378, co. 5, Cod. Civ. A Norma of which all the appeals relative at the same resolution must be educated and decided with one unique sentence, si put in derogation a what is expected by art. 819-ter cod. Proc. Civ.